I am going to ramble a lot here. I started with one thought, moved to another, and really did not care to edit it all by the time I was done. Perhaps the hour, and half a glass of wine had to do with that. So struggle through if you want. I really don't care at this point.
--
I was listening to The GNU/LINUX User Show, http://www.thepodcastnetwork.com/linuxuser/, which is another podcast I am catching up on. I had to cringe a tad every time they said Linus' name, or LINUX. That is because they kept on saying them wrong.
Jon would say GNU properly, which is to pronounce the G. While in the animal, the African Elk, the G is silent, and in C divided by lambda, it is also silent, in GNU the organization/project, it is pronounced.
This is for a few reasons. One is because it is an acronym meaning GNU Not Unix. This makes it a recursive name. Another, and perhaps the most important is because the inventor of GNU pronounces the G.
Now, since Jon pronounced GNU properly, you might think he would pronounce LINUX properly, and perhaps even Linus. Well, you would be wrong.
But this is not an uncommon thing. Many terms get changed by whomever uses them.
A "hacker" historically comes from two sources. One is a programmer who wrote software without hash tables, so he was like a hack writer in the news who would write the "news" without any facts. The other is a ham radio operator who hacked into a commercial radio for the purpose of modifying it for legal armature use. So in the end a hacker was someone that modified computer software or hardware for their own personal use.
Then three teenagers broke into a bank. It was the first time that type of computer crime had been done. The reporter objected to using the proper term. They refused to call three teenage makes a bunch of crackers. So the reporter abused the word hacker, and that story was picked up by the AP wire.
English is the most changed language that is still in use today. The Latin, Slavic, Germanic and Asiatic languages have changed far less than English. Part of this is due to the mixed influences of conquest. Part of it is because people simply don't bother to learn the proper usage.
I constantly abuse the language myself. Irreguardless [sic] of this, it is of note to me when I see, or hear, someone do one thing proper, and then completely botch something else. This is especially true when the things are related.
At least Kelly over at The GNU/LINUX User Show has an excuse. She is all new to this, and is exploring things for the absolute first time.
Jon, on the other hand, might be expected to be geeky enough to have downloaded and listen to the audio file by Linus on the subject.
Well, they finally did listen to that particular audio file. So all is getting better.
Other than rambling on about that, lets see. . . They have had some very interesting guests. This included Richard Stallman, who is in my opinion a bit of an extremist, and unrealist. Still, the interview was exceptionally wonderful to listen to.
Jon tries to bring a practical approach to showing the usability of LINUX. My favorite LINUX for this is SimplyMEPIS. He uses another Debian based distro, Knoppix, both of which support common core, and are good platforms for a more friendly install, intro to LINUX. I just favor MEPIS because of their focus on stable version of apps. This limits their distro some, but makes it a better intro to novices.
Another tactic Jon uses is doing stuff while he reports on it. He describes the menu as he sees it, and the commands as he does them. This makes for a very tangible result with the, "He did it, so can I," sort of feel.
Now back to Kelly Penguin Girl. Kelly is an artist. A good artist from the look of her site. She is also a redhead.
Now, if I was to think of a stereotype and toss artist and redhead in, I would get a touchy, easily to irritate person who is highly interested in direct usability with minimum effort, and looks more than substance.
You can toss that stereotype out the window. Kelly is exceptionally descriptive of what she does on the show, both the good and the bad. Even when drinking beer, and just playing around with things, she relates it all in a wonderful way that captures your interest.
She struggles through things that do not interest her, even while saying she is more interested in the looks! Since Kelly does the work she can not be completely interested in only the look and feel.
Kelly also learns as she goes, and this is expressed in the show. This greatly enhances the "He did it, so can I," sort of feel be adding the, "and heck, she did it too!" thing. This is because most people don't think women can be geeks.
Yes, the largest percentage of online gamers are women over 40, and I know several women who are deeply immersed in technology, like my boss, but the public perception is far different. Geek girls are just not something you see presented in media, so people miss the true number of them. But for a podcast like this, it is a big plus. People get the misconception that she can't be a tech lover, so her understanding is accepted as clear proof that anyone can do this stuff.
Need to remember to mention that theory to my friend who codes IPV6 stuff for a router manufacturer. She will get a laugh out of it. And no, my deep coder friend is not available. She has been with another geek for like eight years now, and I keep telling them to formalize it.
Back to the show. . . . sorta.
All and all I would say the material is reasonably accurately presented. Corrections are done through their web site. The hosts are well worth listening to. That makes their podcast one of the better ones out there.
Being a vendor neutral user with Windows, LINUX, FreeBSD, Zenix, MacOS and other experience, I have some skill in identifying resources that might be worth it for a non-enthusiast to latch on to. The GNU/LINUX User Show can certainly be one of these.
While I think that LINUX still has a ways to go in user friendlyness, this show really helps demonstrate how far it has come.
You can hear practical applications of LINUX technology, and use this to expand your options and understanding.
Konrad